This essay is going to address the importance of euthanasia to both the victims and the family members. The audience readers to which this essay is meant for are the faith groups which may include the Christians, Jewish, Muslim and other religious groups who consider life to be given by God and therefore say only God should take it away In a paper as controversial as euthanasia essay, it’s important to put together a cohesive outline so as to vindicate your stance with a sophisticated structure. Essays on euthanasia, consist of an introduction, thesis statement, evidence-based arguments, opposing viewpoints, and a conclusion. This structure may seem straightforward but you may have a lot of questions ‘Euthanasia: Pros and Cons’ Euthanasia is the practise of ending another person’s life in order to end them suffering. The person would feel no pain‚ and the word ‘euthanasia’ was first used to describe a painless‚ easy and happy death. Seeing a loved one in pain is something which no one wishes for‚ so most people would try to end someone they love’s suffering‚ even if that means
Free Euthanasia Essays | WOW Essays
We use cookies to enhance our website for you. Proceed if you agree to this policy or learn more about it. Type of paper: Essay. Topic: EuthanasiaNursingLiteratureLifePeopleDeathPaineuthanasia conclusion essay, Determination. Pages: 4. Words: Euthanasia is a relevant topic in medical profession leaving the professionals under an ethical dilemma. In many cases, euthanasia conclusion essay, they may be compelled to go against their conscience in upholding the wishes of the patients. Dan W. However, euthanasia conclusion essay, it is noticed that the arguments advanced and organized in support of legalization of Euthanasia are flawed. According to Brock, legalization of euthanasia implies that the individual enjoys the freedom of self determination.
Individual has the satisfaction that they have the control over their life and death, which is what a dignified life is. The next argument following this one focuses on individual well being, which according to the author is possible only when the choice of euthanasia is available to the individual. Life is valuable for its own sake or is intrinsically valuable. In other words, the life should be preserved on the premise that it is worth living. Brock goes on to support his arguments on legalization of euthanasia on the basis of good consequences following euthanasia. He advances the case of Netherlands, where voluntary active euthanasia is legalized, yet euthanasia conclusion essay cases of euthanasia are very low in that nation.
In the U. S, according to the author, where life-sustaining treatment is allowed, the number of patients refusing this option is low, indicating that very few patients would actually want the option euthanasia conclusion essay euthanasia in the U. Brock claims that polls have indicated that a majority of Americans want legalization of euthanasia, that is, euthanasia conclusion essay, people should have the right to opt for euthanasia, if they want it. Voluntary active euthanasia could bring about a euthanasia conclusion essay death and end of pain to terminal patients who euthanasia conclusion essay unbearable suffering.
Therefore, their right to die to end the pain and suffering should not be denied. Finally, the loved one are left only to remember good times. This restores dignity to both the patients as well as their loved ones, euthanasia conclusion essay. Brock next goes on consider the arguments of the opponents and attempts to demolish them as Bad Consequences. The first bad consequence Brock identifies is the concern of patients and their fear of doctors and medicine, if euthanasia is permitted. People would perceive doctors as killers. Brock counters this charge with the contention that active euthanasia should be permitted only in cases that are truly voluntary, then no one would have the reason to fear physicians.
The second bad consequence argument relates to the high cost of medical care, while euthanasia is a cheaper alternative. However, the author claims that there is no evidence favoring erosion in the quality of care in dying patients who used their right to refuse treatment. In addition, only a miniscule percentage of people actually want euthanasia as found in the Netherlands. According to the third bad consequence argument, people may not feel determined to euthanasia conclusion essay if an option to die is available. The author counters this argument with the claim that the right to refuse life sustaining treatment already exists, and there is no evidence to suggest that percentage of patients refusing life sustaining treatment has increased.
The other bad consequences Brock identifies relate to prohibition against homicide and illegal execution of euthanasia. Brock claims that discontinuing life support does not amount to killing. In addition, putting strict procedures in place might possibly eliminate or severely diminish the possibility of foul play. Brock goes on to finally recommend a system and a procedure to address the issue of euthanasia to make it free of error, euthanasia conclusion essay, foul play and controversy. Accordingly, he recommends that law should permit only qualified doctors to perform this act. The procedure should be well laid down and should be scrupulously followed.
Patients euthanasia conclusion essay be informed and the procedure is carried out safely. The persons given the authority to perform this act should be limited and should be held responsible for their action. The point author makes about only a small number of people wanting euthanasia entails that if larger number of people would want to go with euthanasia, it might deserve reconsideration. In other words, ethical right or wrong depends on the number of people, which is a utilitarian perspective. According to this perspective greatest happiness to greatest number of people is euthanasia conclusion essay. On the other hand, euthanasia conclusion essay, the author speaks of the right to self-determination of individuals.
These two ethical positions are incompatible; hence the author appears to contradict himself with his arguments. Yet another contradiction evident in the logic of the author is as follows: Several cases of patients refusing life sustaining treatment have their basis in religion, while the same religion is against committing suicide or letting someone else commit suicide. In addition, the author speaks of physical pain euthanasia conclusion essay by patients suffering terminal illness, but what about the psychological pain? Taking psychological case into consideration might hurt the case of legalization of euthanasia because the number of patients might rise. In addition, measurement of psychological pain is unreliable jeopardizing the case in favor of euthanasia.
There would be safeguard procedures in place to protect patients against abuses of euthanasia, according to the author. These include psychiatric evaluation and definite physical signs. Incorrect diagnosis even with second opinion is not very rare, while a hasty euthanasia entails death sentence for them. It is nearly impossible to eliminate human error despite the strict procedures in place. In conclusion, Dan W Brock has offered a systematic case for legalization of active voluntary euthanasia conclusion essay with a number of arguments and cases, yet his case has flaws and drawbacks, euthanasia conclusion essay.
Euthanasia is a sensitive topic and therefore a rigorous case and debate on the topic is warranted. The author supports the case with the ethics of dignity and freedom of choice. However, the subject of life and death should also take religion into account because it is in life and death that an individual encounters religion at the most intimate levels. In addition, there are a large number of issues including the procedures to identify genuine cases deserving euthanasia and possible frauds likely to arise with legalization that need to addressed with more rigor than it has been.
Brock, Dan W. Hastings Center Report. Note: this sample is kindly provided by a student like you, euthanasia conclusion essay, use it only as a guidance. ID Password recovery email has been sent to email euthanasia conclusion essay. HIRE WRITER Sign in. HIRE WRITER. Who We Are Contact Us Our Writers Our Guarantees How It Works FAQ Honor Code WowEssays Reviews Blog Our Services. ORDER PAPER LIKE THIS. Reference Brock, Dan W. Cite this page Choose cite format: APA MLA Harvard Vancouver Chicago ASA IEEE AMA, euthanasia conclusion essay.
Accessed 18 April Euthanasia Essay Sample. October Accessed April 18, Retrieved April 18, com, Oct Free Essay Examples - WowEssays. Published Oct 29, Share with friends using:. Removal Request. REQUEST THE REMOVAL. Finished papers: Euthanasia conclusion essay paper is created by writer with ID If you want your paper to euthanasia conclusion essay Well-researched, fact-checked, and accurate Original, fresh, based on current data Eloquently written and immaculately formatted. Hire this Writer.
Calculate Price And Order An Essay. Academic level High school College University PhD. Deadline 3 hours 6 euthanasia conclusion essay 12 hours 24 hours 2 days 3 days 7 days 14 days 20 days. order now. Submit Your Paper. Popular Topics A Rose For Emily Abortion Animal Rights Animal Testing Artificial Intelligence Beowulf Black Lives Matter Body Language Bullying Catcher In The Rye Child Abuse Civil War Cognitive Psychology Conspiracy Theory COVID Death Penalty Depression Domestic Violence Euthanasia Gender Roles Global Warming Gun Control Hamlet Holocaust Immigration Inclusive Education Isolation Lord Of The Flies Macbeth Marijuana Minimum Wage Obesity Of Mice And Men Online Identity Organizational Behavior Othello Pandemic Police Brutality Racism Romeo And Juliet Social Issues Sustainability The Great Gatsby The Truman Show The Yellow Wallpaper To Kill A Mockingbird Vietnam War World War 2.
Custom Writing. Email Please enter a valid email. Doesn't match any account. Sign up for an account. Forgot password? or use your social media account. Facebook Google. Don't have an account?
Write an essay on Euthanasia in english - Essay writing on Euthanasia in english
, time: 5:51Euthanasia Essay Conclusion Example For Students - words | Artscolumbia
Euthanasia essay conclusion is the last part of your paper. The approximate number of sentences is , like for introduction. Here you won’t provide new arguments or proofs. Use this paragraph, to sum up, everything you’ve already said. It’s your final chance to convince readers Euthanasia is the practice of ending the life of a patient to limit the patient’s suffering. The patient in question would typically be terminally ill or experiencing great pain and suffering. The word “euthanasia” originated from the Greek words “EU” (good) and “Thanatos” (death). The idea is that instead of condemning someone to In a paper as controversial as euthanasia essay, it’s important to put together a cohesive outline so as to vindicate your stance with a sophisticated structure. Essays on euthanasia, consist of an introduction, thesis statement, evidence-based arguments, opposing viewpoints, and a conclusion. This structure may seem straightforward but you may have a lot of questions
No comments:
Post a Comment